In the advanced technology of today, a photographer can apply a series of Visual effects. A person can apply key screen effects or chroma green pictures or videos. On the use of the key technology of color, is digitally replace the background theme image by any other image or graphic. This is to give an illusion of the item that is being transformed from the Studio to any world imagined by a photographer. There are many different tools or computer programs used to create the illusion of such. You can also apply an aerial image to the image with the help of any kind of computer programs.It is a projected image that gives an impression of floating in the aire.Se mainly used for special effects for film, printers, optical or animated films.
Then also you can use images generated by computer, which is an application that is used in graphics computer. It is used in three dimensional animated films and widely used in video games. Matte painting is also another way to make videos or images visually magnetic type as well as emphatic.Refers to a representation in painting from a landscape or a distant location behind the object.The main objective is to create an illusion of the main stand in a particular space that otherwise would be impractical to visit and perform the rodaje.Por example subject, you can easily make an actor acting out a scene with a matte painting background that is behind the actores.puede apply all of these mentioned techniques and create movies, documentaries, short films or an album in an impressive manner, as well as effective.
123Videomagic.com webmaster Myself provide video editing software, the green screen software, chromakey software help to customize video / image replacement background, giving special effects depending on your needs.



I feel pretty confident answering yes, – and only partly because I have a boss who’s a huge fan of research-based instructional design. We literally spent half of our last company-wide meeting reviewing the basics from learning researchers like Ruth Clark, Robert Gagne, and Benjamin Bloom. One of the criticisms I saw from some of the bloggers who called the brain-based instruction craze a lot of hooey was that the principles were just “common sense”. The problem with common sense is that some of what I see as common practice doesn’t necessarily make sense with what we know about how people learn. Here are the top three “common sense” practices I see that run completely counter to what we know about how people learn.Interesting facts will help the learner better remember the informationRuth Clark’s coherence principle is pretty clear that extraneous information detracts from learning. This extraneous information won’t drive performance, even if the learner does remember it. And the space it takes up in the learner’s brain might well be better used for performance-driving information.Often, subject matter experts want to compound the damage by putting the interesting but irrelevant information right at the start of the training. The basic instructional design principle of primacy tells us that right up front is prime learning real estate – definitely not the place to put something you don’t really care if the learner remembers or not.Pictures engage the learnerThe multimedia principle (Ruth Clark again – we like her stuff quite a lot around BLP) says that pictures have to be relevant to be useful in learning. Sounds obvious enough – but how many powerpoint slides or e-learning pages have you seen with graphics that are clearly there to just make the page look better? Pretty is good – pretty and relevant is required for the instruction to be effective.Practice is a nice-to-have, but can be skipped if you run out of timeWhile I very seldom hear clients talk about this one when designing instructor led training, we’ve all seen it happen. Instructors run out of time, or simply want to win points with their audience by getting done early, and the first thing to go is the exercises. We’ve all heard that practice makes perfect – and most of us have heard the nitpicky version, “perfect practice makes perfect”. Common sense, sure, but also often ignored in practice.This entry was posted on Sunday, July 11th, 2010 at 9:55 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The director is responsible for translating a script into visuals that will be turned over to an editor to pull together into a film. However, as the director joins the project in the writing or pre-production phase and does not leave the project until post-production. The director may well be involved in all aspects of the editing phase, such as sound design, music composition, recording, and mixing into the overall sound, until the film is completed. In other words, the director is responsible for the creative supervision of the film from early in its conception to its completion. The director will work most closely with the producer, who is responsible for the organizational and financial supervision of the film from its conception to its conclusion.